A Brief Introduction to this Page's Purpose

Not Another Dime! is dedicated to documenting the assorted, and sometimes wild, details of Mr. Ken Whitman's business dealings within the Role Playing Game (RPG) industry. This place is NOT intended to be a medium of discussion about Mr. Whitman, pro or con, but instead be a "jumping off" point to enable the reader to make their own informed decision about Mr. Whitman's history and business character. (Editor's Note: After years of this documentation, we simply cannot be anything BUT "con" when it comes to Mr. Whitman)

Whenever possible, links to the original source material will be provided, but in many cases that information may have been deleted or secured behind restricted-access (like a private Facebook page) accounts.

Anything posted here is the opinion of the retrospective author and any content shown is to be considered "fair use" and posted for educational purposes only.

Note to authors: Please begin each post with the original date of the event being documented in the format of YYYY.MM.DD (i.e. If the event being recorded happened on March 15th, 2015 and today's date was August 8th, 2018 the beginning of the post's title would be 2015.03.15 and not 2018.08.08) so readers can use the Chronology page to find specific information. Please use appropriate tags when possible for the same reason.

Note to contributors: If you have some valid data to send, screenshots, links to other Ken Whitman stories, etc., please feel free to send a gmail to notanotherdimeblog. We'll look into it and post if appropriate.

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

2026.01.21 Ken "Whit" Whitman Is Sending Pseudo-Legalese Letters in a (Failed) Attempt at Damage Control

 

2026.01.21 Ken "Whit" Whitman Is Sending Pseudo-Legalese Letters in a (Failed) Attempt at Damage Control
Today we "received" a bit of a one-two dump of info regarding Ken "Whit" Whitman trying to send some Googled-up legalish documents to some vloggers in an attempt to get them to shut up about his current antics. Ok, that is probably how we're reading the situation (ie. an opinion), but he did have some demands. It's better to just show you:

"To Eric Tankard,

This letter serves as a formal request for correction or retraction of materially false statements of fact made by you in the following YouTube video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tb760sCdLc
“Tuesday Afternoon Livestream! 1 PM ET” (published on or about January [insert date], 2026)

This notice is provided in good faith and affords you ten (10) days to correct the record.

Ken Whitman Making Demands

Statements Requiring Correction or Retraction

In the above-referenced video, you repeat, endorse, or materially amplify false statements of fact about me, including but not limited to:

  1. Assertions or implications that I am engaged in scams, fraud, or deceptive business practices, presented as factual conclusions rather than clearly identified opinion.

  2. Repetition or endorsement of unverified third-party allegations concerning my past conduct, crowdfunding activity, or professional history, presented as established fact without independent verification.

  3. Statements implying criminal, unethical, or unlawful conduct, where no charges, findings, or adjudications exist to support such claims.

These statements are not framed as opinion, parody, or rhetorical commentary. They are presented in a factual manner, attributed to me, and are materially misleading or false.

Request

Accordingly, I request that within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice you:

  • Issue a clear correction or retraction of the above statements, and

  • Refrain from further publication or repetition of these specific false factual claims.

This request does not challenge your right to express opinion or criticism. It is limited solely to factual accuracy, attribution, and the avoidance of false statements of fact.

Reservation of Rights

Nothing in this correspondence constitutes a waiver of any rights or remedies. Continued publication or repetition of false statements of fact after notice may be treated as evidence of knowing or reckless disregard for the truth.

I would prefer correction over escalation and trust this can be resolved promptly.

Sincerely,

Ken "Whit" Whitman"

Erik Tankard...really? Hey Kenny....next time you download a form letter, actually my assumption this was an AI generated letter because there are not nearly enough typos (outside of "Tankard"), I don't know.....maybe insert the actual fricken date? It's not that hard....it was literally yesterday. Just look at today's date in a calendar/phone/smart watch and....I don't know...subtract one day and use that!

Erik wasn't the only one to get such a letter. Don over at The Vlog of Many Things got one that he then ran through his lawyer, made a few phone calls, and then responded to. Good stuff....no seriously, highly recommended watching. Don goes point-by-point and is quite upfront about being wrong about a specific dollar figure, which is fair, BUT I doubt even Ken knows how much money he scammed out of people, between the Kickstarters, the KoDT 20 Years of Covers Books, all the KenzerCo merch he sold, etc. He's already on record acknowledging around $180K+ and we've got receipts here for the fact that rest exists.....so don't bother sending NAD a letter.




0 comments :

Post a Comment

The comments on this blog are heavily moderated as this location is simply a one-stop-shop for finding pertinent information otherwise scattered across the internet. If you need to comment on a particular post, please try to do it where the information originated.